As we continue to move toward an age where nothing is done manually and information is ready and available, for some, reading about other centuries makes those eras seem appealing. But why? Was the past in someway better than the society we live in today?
Simply put, the answer is no, at least according to evolutionary psychologist, Loretta Breuning. She puts forth the idea that for many of these people, thinking about the past may trigger neurochemicals that make them feel good. However, in reality, because our technology was less developed, life was much more problematic. There was less sanitation and medicine, meaning that getting a fatal illness was a more likely possibility. In addition, most societies had fewer laws regarding the wellbeing of people. Whether in the factory and more susceptible to unsafe conditions or at home where domestic abuse was less controlled, society left room for a lack of physical security. And all of this does not even cover the notion that minimum wage was essentially nothing in the not too distant past. In a world that is safer, healthier, and more tolerant of different life styles, what could people possibly miss about the life in the “olden days”?
The answer is that we focus on what we lack and take for granted what we have. When we lack something that we are interested in, the brain sets off a sort of “alarm” that gives us the sense that our survival is threatened. Present things that we lack are fresh in the mind and setting off our brain while former lacks become historical abstractions. In addition, pain gets the attention of the brain immediately. In the past, hunger, injury, disease and violence were all more common in people’s lives. Now, there is less of this pain leaving more room to experience social pain and allow for social snubs to hold more value in the mind.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/greaseless/201107/the-good-old-days-were-awful
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/greaseless/201107/the-good-old-days-were-awful